Critical Thinking Test
The Critical Thinking Test shows you whether a candidate can reason rigorously under time pressure. Across 24 questions it measures deduction with syllogisms, sound inference from business passages, recognition of hidden assumptions and fallacies, and the ability to judge which evidence strengthens or weakens a claim.
Summary of the Critical Thinking Test
The Critical Thinking Test shows you whether a candidate can reason rigorously under time pressure. Across 24 questions it measures deduction with syllogisms, sound inference from business passages, recognition of hidden assumptions and fallacies, and the ability to judge which evidence strengthens or weakens a claim.
4 dimensions, scored separately
Syllogisms & deduction
How reliably a person identifies the conclusion that strictly follows from a given set of premises.
Drawing sound inferences
How well a person distinguishes what a passage actually establishes from conclusions that overreach the evidence.
Recognizing assumptions & fallacies
How well a person surfaces the unstated assumptions an argument depends on and names the fallacies it commits.
Evaluating arguments & evidence
How accurately a person judges which evidence genuinely strengthens or weakens a stated claim.
Everything about the Critical Thinking Test
01What is the Critical Thinking Test?
Critical thinking is the discipline of accepting only what the evidence supports. This advanced test operationalizes that discipline across four dimensions drawn from formal and informal logic: syllogistic deduction, inference from passages, assumption and fallacy recognition, and evidence evaluation. Every question is a self-contained business scenario with exactly one defensible answer, and every distractor contains a specific, identifiable reasoning flaw such as a converse error, an overreach, or a confounded comparison. No specialist knowledge is required, so scores reflect reasoning ability rather than domain familiarity.
02How does the Critical Thinking Test work?
Candidates answer 24 multiple-choice questions in 12 minutes, six per dimension, with an even mix of easy, medium, and hard items. Each question presents a short scenario and four options; exactly one option is logically correct. Scores are reported per dimension and overall as percentages.
03Why is the Critical Thinking Test important to employers?
Most costly workplace mistakes are reasoning mistakes: acting on a correlation as if it were a cause, generalizing from a handful of cases, or accepting a conclusion because it sounds plausible. Candidates who score well on this test are less likely to make those errors and more likely to challenge weak arguments before they become decisions. Pair it with role-specific skills tests for a rounded view.
How to interpret Critical Thinking Test results
Every candidate report scores each dimension separately. Here is what high and lower scores typically look like at work, and how to use them in your hiring decision.
Syllogisms & deduction
High scorers: Reliably identifies what strictly follows from stated premises and resists conclusions that merely sound consistent with them. Well suited to work involving rules, contracts, policies, and formal requirements.
Lower scorers: May accept converse errors or read unstated content into premises. Benefits from writing arguments out explicitly and checking each inference step before acting on a conclusion.
Drawing sound inferences
High scorers: Draws only the conclusions a passage actually supports and flags claims that go beyond the evidence. A strong signal for research, reporting, and briefing work where precision matters.
Lower scorers: Tends to blend what a text says with what seems likely, which can turn a cautious finding into an overconfident claim. Encourage citing the exact sentence that supports each conclusion.
Recognizing assumptions & fallacies
High scorers: Quickly surfaces the hidden premise an argument leans on and names common fallacies such as false cause or hasty generalization. Valuable in review, audit, and strategy roles.
Lower scorers: May evaluate arguments only on their stated content and miss the load-bearing assumption underneath. Practice asking what must also be true for this conclusion to hold.
Evaluating arguments & evidence
High scorers: Distinguishes evidence that genuinely bears on a claim from findings that are merely adjacent, and recognizes the value of controls and comparisons. Strong fit for data-informed decision making.
Lower scorers: May treat any favorable fact as support for a claim, including confounded or anecdotal findings. Benefits from asking what alternative explanation this evidence fails to rule out.
What job roles can you hire with the Critical Thinking Test?
- Managers: weigh competing recommendations and spot weak justifications before committing resources
- Analysts: separate what the data shows from what stakeholders want it to show
- Lawyers and compliance officers: test arguments for validity and find the unstated assumptions in a position
- Product managers: judge which evidence actually supports a roadmap bet versus which merely correlates
- Senior individual contributors: evaluate technical trade-offs and push back on plausible but flawed reasoning
Build a multi-measure assessment: tests to pair with the Critical Thinking Test
Problem Solving Test
The Problem Solving test shows you how a candidate handles the small structured problems that fill a real workday: fitting meetings around constraints, choosing options from data, applying prioritization rules, and reasoning through short puzzles. Every question has exactly one correct answer, so scores are objective and easy to compare.
View testVerbal Reasoning Test
The Verbal Reasoning Test measures how accurately a candidate understands written information and how soundly they reason from it. Across 24 questions it covers reading comprehension, analogies, true/false/cannot-say inference, and logical deduction, using realistic workplace passages such as policies, emails, and reports.
View testNumerical Reasoning Test
The Numerical Reasoning Test shows you how confidently a candidate works with numbers under time pressure. It measures four practical skills: ratios and percentages, number series and patterns, reading data tables, and applying arithmetic to everyday business problems.
View testBusiness Ethics and Compliance Test
The Business Ethics and Compliance Test shows you how candidates handle the gray areas of working life: vendor gifts, conflicts of interest, pressure to bend numbers, sensitive data, and disrespectful behavior. Through 20 realistic scenarios, it scores four dimensions of practical ethical judgment so you can hire people who do the right thing when nobody is watching.
View testProof before you interview
Ready to interview your shortlist?
Send one link. Candidates answer on their own time, AI scores every answer, and your shortlist arrives ranked.
How it worksSample reportTest libraryCompare tools
Frequently asked questions
It measures four core reasoning skills: working through syllogisms and deductions, drawing sound inferences from short business passages, spotting the unstated assumptions and fallacies inside arguments, and judging which evidence would strengthen or weaken a claim. Together these show whether a candidate can separate what strictly follows from what merely sounds plausible, a skill that matters in any decision-heavy role.
Each of the 24 multiple-choice questions has exactly one correct answer worth one point. Candidates receive a score for each of the four dimensions, out of six questions apiece, plus an overall score out of 24, both reported as percentages. Results fall into three bands: developing (0-49%), solid (50-79%), and strong (80-100%). There is no penalty for wrong answers.
The questions are built so that every wrong option is plausible rather than obviously wrong. Distractors include conclusions that overreach the evidence, converse errors, and findings that sound relevant but do not bear on the claim. Answering well requires careful, deliberate reasoning rather than surface pattern-matching, which is why the test suits senior and analytical roles rather than entry-level screening.
A syllogism is a short argument where a conclusion is drawn from two given statements. For example: all managers at a firm are trained; Dana is a manager at that firm; therefore Dana is trained. The test presents premises like these and asks which conclusion strictly follows, mixed with tempting options that sound reasonable but are not actually guaranteed by the premises.
The test allows 12 minutes for 24 multiple-choice questions, which is roughly 30 seconds per question. That pace is deliberate: strong critical thinkers can evaluate an argument quickly and accurately under time pressure. No preparation, calculator, or specialist knowledge is required, since every question is self-contained and based on everyday business scenarios.
Last updated July 31, 2026